Sdrplay comparison

When you subscribe, you receive only messages for the product you have subscribed to. You can check your current subscriptions and remove yourself from subscriptions at any time by visiting the Reviews Home page and clicking on the 'here' box under Subscriptions. If you have comments, questions, or problems with this procedure please write to the Forums Manager.

We'll send a copy of the review along with your introduction. Send To:. To build the largest and most complete Amateur Radio community site on the Internet. This project involves a management team of volunteers who each take a topic of interest and manage it with passion. The site will be something that everyone involved can be proud to say they were a part of. Toggle navigation. Forgot Password. Reviews Home.

Time Owned: 6 to 12 months. We needed to conduct a basic EMC test on a data logging device that we are developing in order to achieve a CE self-certification before we could start to market it. All the sub-modules were already CE certified, so our test could be fairly high-level and we wanted to reduce the costs, so we decided to do it ourselves. We set up a simple test range at a relatively isolated location and completed the tests in a few hours.

Since then, I keep the RSP1A in the shack and use it sometimes to scan the bands or to decode obscure signals. It compares well with my IC in terms of sensitivity and selectivity - which is pretty good going for a unit that is so cheap. It does require a reasonably high specification PC to run successfully. I diagram based e46 electric wire harness diagram it with an HP laptop that was fairly high specification - about five or six years ago - and I do need to pay attention to the sampling rate and decimation settings if I am to avoid audio breakup.

Time Owned: 3 to 6 months. The box is so tiny it gets lost on my radio rack. The only complaint is the crappy SMA connecter but when you have a tiny plastic box not much else will fit. Software is either making this radio or breaking it. If you run Windows the supplied software is fairly easy to set up. If you run Linuxbe prepared for some head scratching as not every distribution is the same and lib requirements will vary by brand. For Linux I found running Gqrx in binary seems to at least get me started.

CubicSDR is an issue. I haven't got around to trying other possibilities. In real radio performance, software defines everything. I can hear almost as well on it as I can with the Kenwood TS which has an outstanding receive section and probably a bit better than the TS which is no slouch on receive.

It's been around a long time and the SDR rig surpasses that. It's a great little rig for those interested in being on the edge of technology. It won't be a boat anchor with lots of knobs but it won't be a 30 dollar Chinese portable either. Time Owned: 0 to 3 months.Forums New posts Search forums.

Media New media Search media. Classifieds New listings. Log in.

sdrplay comparison

Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter Roveer Start date Aug 28, Status Not open for further replies.

Roveer Member. Joined Apr 29, Messages So I'm contemplating a nice SDR project for when the cold months descend and it's nice to be inside.

RSPDuo versus RSPdx with one antenna

I really like the idea of SDR. I see dollar dongles being sold. I also see airspy and SDRplay equipment for considerably more money.

sdrplay comparison

As I'm getting closer to actually buying anything I'd be interested to know if the more expensive equipment has any real advantage over the cheap stuff in my application? One thing I notice whether it's my Uniden scanners or the SDR youtube videos that I watch is that the audio from a digital radio system always sounds terrible.

It just doesn't sound that bad in the police cars and emergency vehicles.When you subscribe, you receive only messages for the product you have subscribed to. You can check your current subscriptions and remove yourself from subscriptions at any time by visiting the Reviews Home page and clicking on the 'here' box under Subscriptions.

If you have comments, questions, or problems with this procedure please write to the Forums Manager. We'll send a copy of the review along with your introduction. Send To:. To build the largest and most complete Amateur Radio community site on the Internet. This project involves a management team of volunteers who each take a topic of interest and manage it with passion.

The site will be something that everyone involved can be proud to say they were a part of. Toggle navigation. Forgot Password. Reviews Home. Its power and versatility really shine when combined with the SRDuno V1. SDRPlay also provides a lots of documents and videos showing how to get the most out of their product across a wide variety of applications and use cases.

The SDRPlay customer support also is first rate. They solved an issue I had moving to a new computer promptly and expertly. Easily a five star product given the excellent, free accompanying software SDRUno and the quality of the unit. Use of the RSP2pro for IF panadapter and for laboratory measurements was not done; the R does not have this capability.

Differences between $20 dongle vs airspy vs SDRplay

The writer lives in a high RF signal area. Several 50 kW broadcast FM transmitters are located within three miles of, and line of sight to his receiving location. They produce incident power levels at the receiving antenna terminals of dBm. Other high-powered FMs are slightly more distant. Very high levels of ambient urban electrical power line noise and random line transients add additional reception problems. Even under these difficult conditions, the RSP2pro does a credible job of receiving, as does the R In the presence of very strong off-channel signals, some blocking of desired weaker on-channel signals is apparent.Search everywhere only in this topic.

Advanced Search. Classic List Threaded. SDRPlay as panadapter. How does this compare with the P3? Re: SDRPlay as panadapter. Makes for a nice 2nd receiver, although it takes a separate computer to support the operation.

sdrplay comparison

The P3 is a stand alone display. I don't have a P3 thus can't say with regard to performance. In reply to this post by rlindzen. I have been tempted to try the RSP2 which is out now because it has band filtering For the total turnkey setup, I suspect the P3 might be the easiest Big thumbs up for Win4K3 Suite however I am currently playing with this. Barry K3NDM. It works ok for what I do.

No, it doesn't compare to my 24 bit. Neither lets me see really weak signals. I do not use the P3. It is the only piece of Elecraft produced gear that doesn't fit my station architecture. And, the rsp2 can't be used to drive apps like CW Skimmer. I guess what I'm saying is that you need to think about what you are trying to build, long term, and what it takes. The LP-Pan and a good sound card make a good basis for flexibility. However, the maximum you can display, today, is around kHz. And, you may not be able to see deeply into the noise.

Many thanks for the responses. The setup is extremely simple, but I wasn't sure what the downside was. Hi, Max's answer is right on the money. If you never used a panadapter before, any of them will be a fine addition. Also if you are not a avid contester, the RSP1, can't be beat for the money. Larry Gauthier K8UT. Without lab instruments to overcome my subjective comparison, I actually find myself preferring the SDRplay.

So do I. Edward R Cole. Noise floor below KHz is dBm and with antenna noise varies to dBm in the m band.In the spirit of full disclosure, SDRplay is a long-time supporter of the SWLing Post and I have alpha- and beta-tested a number of their products in the past. To be clear, while I am using beta software, this is not a beta SDR, but one from a first limited production run. It has been updated and upgraded, with a completely new front-end design. Personally, I invest in companies that support radio enthusiasts for the long haul…those that do their own designs, innovations, and production.

SDRplay is one of those companies.

Join in with the new series of SDRplay live webinar workshops

Wideband coverage can come at a cost. Both little Airspy SDRs have wooed DXers with their impressive dynamic range and overall ability to work weak signals in the HF portion of the spectrum. But have they succeeded? As I say in most of my SDR reviews: doing comparisons with receivers that have so many features and adjustments is never easy.

In other words, we want an apples-to-apples comparison, but it can be difficult to achieve, especially with new products. The RSPdx is not in full production at time of posting, thus application options are limited. The benefit of using SDRuno is that you unlock the full potential of the RSPdx, plus signal and noise numbers are incredibly accurate.

sdrplay comparison

I also matched filter settings and made an effort to match AGC and volume settings as closely as I could. Is this comparison perfect? Probably not, but I did the best with the time I had available. I do intend to make further comparisons in the future. I clicked on it and quickly discovered it was Medi 1. The signal was faint, but I could clearly ID at least one song. This truly impressed me because I believe this was the first time I had logged Medi 1 on longwave from the shack.

I tried to explore more of the longwave band, but due to local RFI I suspect an appliance in my homemost of the LW band was inundated with noise. With that said, I did grab three of my benchmark non-directional beacons. A major improvement over its predecessor. Note that my horizontal delta loop antenna is omni-directional, hence the tug-of-war you hear between stations in the clips above.

In truth, I could have done more to stabilize the signal on both of these fine SDRs, but I wanted to keep the comparison as fair as possible. You might have noticed that both were running AM sync mode. It seems the sync lock on the RSPdx may have also improved——though I would need to do a direct comparison with the RSP2 to know for sure——but in terms of stability, I still found that the WinRadio Excalibur was superior. And, after having spent two weeks with the RSPdx on the shortwave bands, I would say this is a bit of an understatement.We continue to regularly add video guides to our Youtube Channel.

I have a ThinkBook notebook PC. It has XP with service pack3 installed and is in good performance shape. Seems to accept other USB devices and install and run their software.

I just get the window that is running picking up noise and no signals, can unplug the SDR fob with no difference Before I waste my time with these high end SDRplay devices, has anyone have this problem? Is there some dumb little switch I need to flip in the XP configuration?

Make sure that the laptop being used is compatible with USB 2. Older machines had a bios setting for USB speed selection. High speed of Full speed. Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Spread the radio love. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Please support this website by adding us to your whitelist in your ad blocker. Ads are what helps us bring you premium content! Thank you!Wyn writes:. I like them both, but on balance I prefer the RSP. The pluses of the RSP over the Airspy for me are:. Sensitivity — At least with my Airspy, I find the sensitivity a bit disappointing.

The RSP is on the other hand excellent. I read on another forum one user claiming that the difference between the two was as much as 3 dB.

Join in with the new series of SDRplay live webinar workshops

Programmable filters. You can change the selectivity from as low as KHz to the full bandwidth of 8 MHz, This is a huge plus for DX-ing if you live in an area with very strong local stations. For some people, this is a really big deal. Many thanks for your comparison, Wyn. I live in a very RF quiet area—I am curious if anyone has used the SDRplay in urban areas, near local broadcast stations and experienced any overloading or serious imaging.

What is the software support like for both? I use a bunch of programs, but probably SDR is my favorite for simple things. If you google carefully you should find a link to v, which still works great with the RSP1. Upcoming FMBC afficionado here! How could this happen? On the 17th this month we had a smidge of tropo weather and almost each of the few free channels around here was populated with clear signals from up to km distance.

RTL SDR V3 Dongle vs. SDR Play HF and MW part 2

But I read from serious DXers that it was actually a bit deaf. Sensitivity ig good above, up to The 2nd SDR would be very helpful there.